Lateral acromioplasty for correction of the critical shoulder angle

Background

The bony morphology of the acromion is well known to determine mechanical outlet impingement and represents a risk factor for the development of rotator cuff tear (RCT; [4, 18]). In 1986, Bigliani et al. [4] introduced the wellestablished classification including three types of acromion shape in the outlet view. However, no statistically significant correlation could be shown in regard to RCT. Among others, the critical shoulder angle (CSA) represents a significant radiological parameter correlated with RCT, first described by Moor et al. [17]. It is defined by a line through the superior and inferior glenoid poles and a second line through the inferior glenoid pole and the lateral acromion edge (Fig. 1). Resection of the lateral acromion edge in patients with a pathological CSA and RCT is suggested in order to normalize the CSA and to prevent RC re-tearing. To date, only cadaveric studies exist describing the influence of lateral acromion resection on the CSA.

Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe the arthroscopic technique of acromioplasty with resection of the lateral acromion edge (LA = lateral acromioplasty)thus normalizing a pathological CSA and to report the preliminary clinical and radiological data. In contrast to former preclinical studies that used cadavers, initial clinical experiences and preliminary results of LA are reported.

Preoperative planning

The CSA is measured on a true anteroposterior (AP) view with a commonly available digital measuring software (Fig. 1a). The gleno-acromial line (defined by the inferior glenoid pole and the lateral acromion edge) is then moved medially until the digital angle measurement tool shows a normal CSA (<33°). The axis of rotation is the inferior glenoid pole. Now, the distance between the lateral acromion edge and the actual position of the upper end of the glenoacromial line is measured in millimeters (Fig. 1b). This calculated portion is to be resected during the LA (Fig. 1c). The CSA is susceptible to measuring errors [24]. Therefore, care must be taken to obtain correct “true AP” views in order to minimize miscalculation related to malrotation. Using the true AP view, interrater reliability has been shown to be as high as 0.993 [5].

Indication

In the authors’ clinical practice, the LA is indicated in the following cases of pathological CSA: 1. Failure of nonoperative treatment

including subacromial injections, oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy, and physical exercises focusing on head-recentering in patients with an intact RC in terms of isolated therapeutic subacromial decompression 2. Concomitant RC repair in terms of prophylactic subacromial decompression 3. Massive, irreparable RCT in terms of palliative subacromial decompression together with tuberculoplasty

Surgical technique

The procedure is performed with the patient under general anesthesia combined with an interscalene nerve block and in beach chair position. Preoperative endovenous antibiotic prophylaxis is performed with 1.5 g cefazoline when RC repair is planned. The shoulder is prepared and draped free. Bony landmarks including the scapular spine, acromion, AC joint, distal clavicle, and coracoid are delineated with a skin marker. A posterior standard viewing portal as well as an antero-lateral and an anterior portal are set (Fig. 2). Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy is carried out through the standard posterior portal in order to assess accompanying intraarticular pathologies. After switching in the subacromial space, an antero-lateral portal is established and bursectomy is performed, especially at the anterolateral aspect of the humeral head. The bony circumferences of the anterior and lateral acromion are freed from the periosteum and deltoid muscle origins using an electrocoagulation device. This prevents soft tissue damage and allows for precise bone resection.

Fig. 1 a Preoperative radiograph showing a pathological critical shoulder angle (CSA) of 40°. b Calculation of the degree of resection, 7 mm in this case. c Postoperative radiograph showing a normalized CSA of 32°

Preliminary results

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study. Our first series of LA included 20 patients (12 men, 8 women) with an average age of 62 ± 4.2 years. All patients underwent arthroscopic RC repair of an isolated supraspinatus tendon tear (mid-size) and an additional LA. The mean preoperative CSA measured 39.7 ± 1.0°, which was reduced to an average value of 32.1 ± 1.2°. Short-term follow-up after an average of 16 ± 2.4 months showed no re-tear at ultrasound evaluation and an average Constant score of 88.4 ± 5.5 points. No local complications were observed at the lateral acromion edge with no evident impairment of the acromial mid-third portion of the deltoid origin.

Discussion

The importance of the present study lies in the introduction of a new all-arthroscopic technique for normalization of a CSA, which we call “lateral acromioplasty” (LA).

In 1972, Neer [18] published his work on anterior acromioplasty for chronic subacromial impingement syndrome. In 1986, Bigliani et al. [4] classified the shape of the anterior acromion in supraspinatus outlet view into three types. For many years, shoulder surgeons have “corrected” the acromion shape in patients with subacromial impingement or as additional procedure in patients undergoing RC repair in order to remove the cause of subacromial mechanical conflict or to avoid postoperative stress to the repaired RC. In the past few decades, arthroscopic acromioplasty ranged among the most widely performed procedures in shoulder surgery [9].

However, several recent studies have questioned the true benefit of a normalization of the anterior acromial slope. The effectiveness of surgical management of stage II impingement has been investigated in high-quality controlled randomized trials and no significant difference was found compared with the nonsurgical treatment with supervised exercises [6, 8, 12]. Furthermore, ithas beenshown that outcomes after RCT repair were similar with and without acromioplasty [15, 16]. Probably due to this research, the number of conventional acromioplasties performed has been declining [20].

Recently, new parameters were introduced describing a specific scapula morphology, which might represent pathogenetic factors for RC disease. These parameters, the acromion index (AI) and the CSA, are a matter of current debate among shoulder surgeons.

In 2006 Nyffeler et al. [19] proposed the AI as the lateral extension of the acromion in relation to the humeral head. Since then, some authors have found significant correlations between high AI values and RCT [13, 19, 25]. Other studies could not support this possible association [2, 10].

More recently, Moor et al. [17] introduced the CSA, defined as the angle between the plane of the glenoid and the line to the most lateral aspect of the acromion on a true AP view. Large angles have been found to correlate with degenerative RCT, while small angles correlate with osteoarthritis [17, 23] and, as recently published, with SLAP (superior labrum anterior­posterior) lesions [21]. A biomechanical study by Gerber et al. [7] supported the hypothesis that high CSAs can induce supraspinatus overload especially at low degrees of active abduction.

If deemed a pathogenetic factor in the development of degenerative RCTs, a normalization of the CSA might help to avoid future tears or re-tears in patients with pathologically large angles.

So far, no clinical study has been published in the literature describing the technique and the preliminary outcomes for normalization of the CSA via an LA. The technique is capable of normalizing the CSA based on preoperative planning. It was shown to be easy, reproducible, and led to a reliable correction of the CSA in the first case series.

The study is limited by the lack of longterm follow-up data. The sample size is quite small, and larger, prospective controlled trials are necessary in order to evaluate the role of LA compared with conventional acromioplasty according to Neer. There was discussion on whether the technique itself might be limited by a potential weakening of the deltoid muscle due to violation of the insertion site or alteration of the pretension. However, the deltoid muscle arises from the superior surface and the anterior surface of the acromion, with prominent tendinous origins from the superior surface [14]. These insertion sites are preserved during the LA procedure. A recent laboratory study by Katthagen et al. [11] reported that the deltoid origin was not damaged when performing an LA. In a second study, the same group showed that LA did not weaken the structural or mechanical integrity of the lateral deltoid origin [11]. In the present study, no clinically evident impairment of the deltoid function was detected. In all patients, a normal CSA was achieved with LA and all patients regained good shoulder function.

To date, only one study exists in cadaveric shoulder specimens proving the feasibility of a technique for LA [1]. However, no other clinical pilot study exists reporting on the feasibility and preliminary outcomes using an arthroscopic technique fornormalizationofthe CSA in a real operating room setting, where surgical complications, e.g., bleeding, may occur.

Future research will reveal whether this new technique will lead to better clinical results or will end up being declined according to Scott’s parabola [22].

Fig. 3 Arthroscopic technique. a The burr is inserted through the anterior portal. Resection is carried out starting from the antero-lateral acromion edge. The coracoacromial ligament (CAL) can also be seen (diamond). b The burr is used as a caliper estimating the amount of resection. c Final resection view from the posterior portal. The intact deltoid fascia can be seen (asterisk). View through anterior portal after finalization of the resection with the burr through the posterior portal

Practical conclusion

• The critical shoulder angle (CSA) is a radiological parameter associated with a higher incidence of rotator cuff tears.
• We present an all-arthroscopic technique–called lateral acromioplasty (LA)–in which the lateral edge of the acromion is resected to reduce and correct the CSA after preoperative planning.
• Preliminary results from our first case series of 20 patients showed that the technique is easy, reproducible, and led to a reliable correction of the CSA.
• No clinically evident impairment of the deltoid function was detected using the LA technique, with all patients regaining good shoulder function.

Obere Extremität

Mark Tauber, Peter Habermeyer, Nikolaus Zumbansen & Frank Martetschläger

Lateral acromioplasty for correction of the critical shoulder angle

Obere Extremität Schulter · Ellenbogen
ISSN 1862-6599

Obere Extremität
DOI 10.1007/s11678-020-00578-w
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-020-00578-w

Funding. Open access funding provided by Paracelsus Medical University.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest. M. Tauber, P. Habermeyer, N. Zumbansen, and F. Martetschläger declare that they have no competing interests.

The study was approved by review board of the clinic. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

References

1. Altintas B, Kaab M, Greiner S (2016) Arthroscopic lateral acromion resection (ALAR) optimizes rotator cuff tear relevant scapula parameters. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:799­804
2. Ames JB, Horan MP, Van Der Meijden OA et al (2012) Association between acromial index and outcomes following arthroscopic repair of fullthickness rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1862­1869
3. Banas MP, Miller RJ, Totterman S (1995) Relationship between the lateral acromion angle and rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 4:454­461
4. Bigliani LU, Morrison D, April E (1986) The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans 10:216
5. Bouaicha S, Ehrmann C, Slankamenac K et al (2014) Comparison of the critical shoulder angle in radiographs and computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 43:1053­1056
6. Farfaras S, Sernert N, Hallström E et al (2014) Comparison of open acromioplasty, arthroscopic acromioplasty and physiotherapy in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a prospective randomised study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00167-014-3416-4
7. Gerber C, Snedeker JG, Baumgartner D et al (2014) Supraspinatus tendon load during abduction is dependent on the size of the critical shoulder angle: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Res 32:952­957
8. Haahr JP, Ostergaard S, Dalsgaard J et al (2005) Exercises versus arthroscopic decompression in patients with subacromial impingement: a randomised, controlled study in 90 cases with a one year follow up. Ann Rheum Dis 64:760­764
9. Habermeyer P, Hansen N, Jung D (1997) Arthroscopic surgical measures in the shoulder joint. Chirurg 68:1085­1092
10. Hamid N, Omid R, Yamaguchi K et al (2012) Relationship of radiographic acromial characteristics and rotator cuff disease: a prospective investigation of clinical, radiographic, and sonographic findings. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:1289­1298
11. Katthagen JC, Marchetti DC, Tahal DS et al (2016) The effects of arthroscopic lateral acromioplasty on the critical shoulder angle and the anterolateral deltoid origin: an anatomic cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 32(4):569­575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.019
12. Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Arnala I et al (2009) Does arthroscopic acromioplasty provide any additional value in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome?: A two-year randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1326­1334
13. Kim JR, Ryu KJ, Hong IT et al (2012) Can a high acromion index predict rotator cuff tears? Int Orthop 36:1019­1024
14. Kumar VP, Satku K, Liu J et al (1997) The anatomy of the anterior origin of the deltoid. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79:680­683
15. MacDonald P, McRae S, Leiter J et al (2011) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:1953­1960
16. Milano G, Grasso A, Salvatore M et al (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without subacromial decompression: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 23:81­88
17. Moor BK, Bouaicha S, Rothenfluh DA et al (2013) Is there an association between the individual anatomy of the scapula and the development of rotator cuff tears or osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint?: A radiological study of the critical shoulder angle. Bone Joint J 95-B:935­941
18. Neer CS 2nd (1972) Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54:41­50
19. Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Sukthankar A et al (2006) Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:800­805
20. Paloneva J, Lepola V, Karppinen J et al (2015) Declining incidence of acromioplasty in Finland. Acta Orthop 86:220­224
21. Patzer T, Wimmer N, Verde PE et al (2019) The association between a low critical shoulder angle and SLAP lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(12):3944­3951
22. Scott JW (2001) Scott’s parabola: the rise and fall of a surgical technique. Br Med J 323:1477
23. Spiegl UJ, Horan MP, Smith SW et al (2015) The critical shoulder angle is associated with rotator cuff tears and shoulder osteoarthritis and is better assessed with radiographs over MRI. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3587-7
24. Suter T, Gerber Popp A, Zhang Y et al (2015) The influence of radiographic viewing perspective and demographics on the critical shoulder angle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:e149­e158
25. Zumstein MA, Jost B, Hempel J et al (2008) The clinical and structural long-term results of open repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2423­2431